Wednesday, December 05, 2007
Why I Don't Watch Heroes, Revisited
I'll make you Heroes viewers a deal, everybody I know that's been trying to get me to watch it. If, years from now, when Heroes finally wraps up and airs its final episode, the consensus among viewers is that the showrunners *did* know what they were doing all along, and the mysteries when revealed are internally consistent and clever, all along the way, then I'll get the DVDs and give it a shot. But at this point I'm hedging my bets, and taking it on faith that, like Alias, like X-Files, like Smallville, et cetera, et al, that when its said and done there'll have been some good episodes, maybe even good parts of seasons, but in the final summation the shows will have ended up closer to the shit end of the scale than genius. I'm happy and willing to be proved wrong, but I'm not going to invest the hundreds of hours to find out for myself. I'll let someone else be the canary in the coal mine!I had expected to wait years to put the question to all you Heroes viewers, but in light of the writers' strike, and the fact that the network has been promoting the most recent episode in some places as a "finale" (and in others as something called a "mid-season finale," whatever that means), this seems like a good place to stop and do a level check.
To recap, in the spring I said that, while Heroes might have some good episodes, and even good runs of episodes in different seasons, it would end up sucking, sooner or later. Bearing in mind that a few weeks back, in response to what Entertainment Weekly called "a creative decline," creator Tim Kring apologized to fans for the failings of this season, I have to ask: was I right?
Peter, a character on the show who is plagued with chronic stupidity and inaction, recovers his lost memories in a flashback show. The thing is, he recalls a whole bunch of things that didn't happen to him. At all.
That, my friend, is only the tip of the poop ice berg that is Heroes.
I forgave a lot of the bad writing of the first season as I thought it was kind of a send-up of comic book schlock wrapped in a frenetic pace. But, it was really just someone talking so fast, with wild hand gestures, so that you didn't realize the line of bullshit you were being fed.
Let me ask you a question in return: do you think the showrunners on Battlestar Galactica have demonstrated that they knew what they were doing? What about the showrunners on Lost?
Season two, while it's had moments, hasn't been as strong - I haven't seen the final two due to workload here - but I'd argue that it was pulling out of it (around the time HRG was shot for those who watch) when the writer's strike forced their hand. This is an unforeseen, almost unprecedented bit of outside interference, so some allowances there might be in order.
As for Lost, I remain convinced that the showrunners there know exactly where everything's going, and have since the beginning. I may be blinded by my love for the show, but I honestly don't think they've even made any real missteps since the beginning, and even the aspects of the show that some viewers have decried still worked for me.
But honestly, in your heart of hearts, is that first season of Heroes better than Rome? Than Deadwood?
When it comes to disliking characters on Heroes, they're all Wesly Crusher analogues.
Parkman is a perpetual idiot played by a man who can't act his way out of a wet paper bag with a machete.
Suresh is a self-righteous moron.
Peter is an idiot with a mouth only Sylvester Stallone could love.
Alejandro! Maya! Alejandro! Maya! Alejandro! Maya! Alejandro! Maya! Alejandro! Maya! Alejandro! Maya! Alejandro! Maya! Need I say more?
Bah! I could complain about this show for hours. I'm glad I'm not watching it anymore.
Now, for BSG, the last season was a bummer. Complete crap. Razor was a waste of time, and had no redeeming qualities at all. Not one single plot point about Cara's miraculous return was advanced in that turdball of a movie. Not one.
-=SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS=-
~~~~ you have been warned ~~~
==... seriously. this is it ...==
But, we did get yet another minor character in the spotlight who was another drug-addicted female who was misunderstood by her peers, and came through at the end with a suicide that proved her worth beyond measure. Can't they come up with any other kind of female character to build an episode or movie about?
but I'd argue that it was pulling out of it [...] when the writer's strike forced their hand. This is an unforeseen, almost unprecedented bit of outside interference, so some allowances there might be in order.
My understanding is that the strike caused the first arc of the season to be the entire season, not that it forced the showrunners to bring anything to a premature conclusion. I think it's fair to judge the episodes that aired using the same standards as with any television (and I don't just mean Heroes; I think this applies to all shows currently airing).
But I usually don't like to admit that fact now..
But anytime that you have character-driven shows, there are going to be the occasional ones that rub you the wrong way. It's the same way with Lost. And I pretty much started hating every character on the new BSG, which is why I stopped watching during the first season.
<< Home













