Tuesday, January 15, 2008
A Brief Note Regarding Lightsabers
He insists on calling them "laser-swords." Really, he does.
This isn't a new bit of information, just something that bothers me from time to time. I mean, really... Laser-swords? Leaving aside entirely the fact that "laser" is an acronym that would be meaningless in a galaxy long ago and far away, the name "light saber" is just so much more... elegant. "Laser sword" is just dumb.
(This is honestly the kind of thing that keeps me up at night...)
We just rewatched these, and although I'm no expert in swordplay, I've often thought that the two-handed style Luke and Vader use is just splendid.
I've only handled a claymore, however, and not a saber. I've been employed as a model at conventions to show how well balanced a properly forged claymore can be, and that even a petite woman can handle one.
You think that's bad, try having Seals and Croft's "Summer Breeze" rolling around your head at nap time. :)
A few years ago Allison and I did some kind of virtual reality game at Disney World that incorporated lightsaber-like swords. Before you put on the VR helmet, you picked up what looked like a heavy flashlight that was cabled to the floor. When you had the VR helmet on and the lightsaber "turned on," a weight inside the handle shifted upwards, from the bottom of the handle to the top, so that it felt like the blade had just come out at the same time that the VR rig was projecting the image of the lightsaber extending. And having watched Star Wars repeatedly since the late seventies, that seemed completely right to me.
Of course, there's no rational reason why a beam of light or energy or plasma or whatever it is should have any appreciable heft or weight, but when did rationality ever define how things in Star Wars worked...?
<< Home














